If not TIP, then what?
Families searching for alternatives to the Food Allergy Institute usually hit one of three walls: the waitlist, the price, or the travel. Some also want a deeper published evidence base. Each wall has different doors, each door fits a different family, and each has real numbers attached.
Five real alternatives, mapped by fit rather than ranked. The at-home route (Curex) β the only fully at-home food allergy program, 50,000+ patients: gentler milligram doses under the tongue, video or text visits from any state, more patients finishing the course, $199/month (environmental allergy plans from $79/month), typically $10,000+ saved over a course. The first door for families outside the coastal metros, families who move or travel, working parents, adults, and children in sport. Latitude β the other leading in-person clinic and the fastest supervised route: about a dozen locations across California and New York, in-network insurance for visits, a published active phase of 6β12 months (average about 8.4 months). Allergy Associates of La Crosse β the in-person sublingual clinic: Onalaska, Wisconsin, food allergy drops since 1970, infants through adults, one in-person first visit then rechecks that can be virtual, explicitly treating anaphylaxis history and uncontrolled asthma in person. Standard OIT at a local allergist β published protocols offered off-label at practices in roughly 35 states; call allergists near you directly, since directories are incomplete. Xolair β the only FDA-approved food allergy medication since Palforzia's July 2026 withdrawal: it reduces reaction severity on accidental exposure but does not desensitize, and avoidance continues. A history of anaphylaxis or severe, poorly controlled asthma routes to in-person assessment regardless of provider. Curex is one of the providers in this market β the only fully at-home food allergy program β so verify every figure here against the sources.
Medically reviewed by Dr. Chet Tharpe, M.D. Β· Last reviewed September 2026
Disclosure
Where we stand on this list
Curex is one of the providers in this market β the only fully at-home food allergy program β so verify every figure here against the sources. Every competitor figure below is either published by the provider on its own site (dated where checked) or attributed to patient reports, and where reports conflict we show the range.
Why families look
The four walls
The Food Allergy Institute's Tolerance Induction Program has a genuinely devoted patient community and published claims of a 99% success rate after completion. Families who go looking for alternatives anyway usually name one of four reasons.
- The waitlist In 2019, journalists counted roughly 1,350 families waiting about 13 months; parents from the 2018β2021 era describe waits of 1.5β2 years. No current figure is published. A new New Jersey clinic β FAI's first outside Southern California β opens September 15, 2026, which may ease intake, but its effect on the list is not yet known.
- The price FAI publishes $979β$1,079/month depending on age, with a 6-month minimum, and its own cost page estimates a first year at roughly $11,748 (cash) to $15,425 (insurance). Patients report about $15,000 all-in for year one, about $12,000 for year two, and an annual fee of roughly $4,000 after reaching remission that several families describe as not disclosed upfront. The full cost breakdown itemizes it.
- The travel More than half of FAI's patients travel from outside California, by the clinic's own account, for 4β6 in-person visits per year. Families report flying in every 8β12 weeks from Florida, Texas, New Jersey, New York, Minnesota, and abroad, and the patient community shares host housing and donated airline miles to make it work. Typical duration is 2.5β4 years; complex cases run longer.
- The evidence question A 2021 Undark investigation reported that the main study supporting TIP covered 51 patients, retrospectively, with no control group, and quoted academic allergists doubting the 99% figure. A July 2021 Change.org petition (312 signatures) asked the clinic to publish safety and outcome data and disclose conflicts of interest. The clinic's BBB profile shows a C+ rating with one unanswered complaint. These are attributed criticisms, not verdicts β the positive patient reports are just as real.
The map
Five doors, by the wall you hit
| You hit⦠| First door to try | Why |
|---|---|---|
| The waitlist | At-home SLIT; Latitude; La Crosse; local OIT allergists | At-home treatment starts without a list. Latitude's public record shows no waitlist complaint cluster, La Crosse books a first visit in Onalaska rather than running an intake list, and distributed OIT practices intake independently of FAI's. |
| The price | At-home SLIT; La Crosse; local OIT | Curex's food allergy plan is $199/month, environmental allergy plans from $79/month, typically $10,000+ saved over a course. La Crosse's food drops run about $2.20 a day patient-pay after a $750β850 first visit. Local OIT bills visit-by-visit without destination-program pricing. |
| The travel | At-home SLIT; Xolair locally | One removes geography from treatment entirely β video or text visits from any state, drops that travel in a bag. The other is an FDA-approved injection every 2β4 weeks, administrable near home, that reduces accidental-exposure severity. |
| Severity gates (anaphylaxis, severe asthma) | In-person assessment β Allergy Associates of La Crosse is one named option | Candidacy for any program β theirs or ours β is a clinical decision that starts face to face. La Crosse explicitly treats patients with a history of anaphylaxis and uncontrolled asthma in person. |
Competitor figures are what each provider published on its own site or what patients reported publicly, dated where checked (September 2026). Prices and policies change β confirm current figures with each provider, including us, before enrolling.
Alternative 1
Latitude: the closest like-for-like
Latitude Food Allergy Care is the other leading in-person clinic, and the most direct substitute for a family committed to supervised desensitization at the fastest pace. The clinic comparison page sets the clinics and Curex side by side; here is the short version.
From latitudefoodallergycare.com, checked September 2026
- FootprintAbout 12 locations: Redwood City, San Francisco, San Rafael, and San Ramon in Northern California; Pasadena, Irvine, San Diego, Sherman Oaks, and West LA in Southern California; Manhattan, Brooklyn, Long Island, and White Plains in New York.
- Outcomes98% of patients under 4 achieved desensitization with OIT, 94% of patients of all ages (internal data, 2026). An AAAAI 2025 abstract with Weill Cornell reported that about 5% of doses among 1,000+ OIT patients caused any reaction, the overwhelming majority mild.
- Timeline6β12 months of active treatment to reach maintenance, averaging about 8.4 months β then lifelong maintenance dosing, with long-term care offered.
- InsuranceDiagnostics and visits are 'typically covered' in-network (Aetna, Anthem, Blue Shield, Cigna, UnitedHealthcare, and others by region). The one-time OIT program fee is a non-covered service; the amount is not published. FSA/HSA eligible, payment plans offered.
Public reviews and threads; attribute accordingly
- The program feeA Bay Area patient reported having to pay more than $4,000; a New York reviewer put it at over $5,000. Read that as a $4,000β$5,000+ range by region and year, on top of in-network billing.
- AdultsA 36-year-old peanut-allergic patient reported being accepted although the clinic said it doesn't normally treat adults, citing a peanut component IgE threshold of 2.0 or greater, with 6β12 months to maintenance.
- The recordBBB: Not Rated, with no complaints filed. No petition, no unanswered complaints, no organized skepticism cluster β a notable contrast with FAI's third-party record.
- Results families describeTwins previously anaphylactic to a bite of egg now eat a whole hard-boiled egg daily plus peanut, sesame, and tree nuts, per their family, who chose Latitude over TIP. Reviewers particularly praise the oral food challenges for removing false-positive allergy labels.
Alternative 2
Allergy Associates of La Crosse: sublingual, in person
Allergy Associates of La Crosse is the third leader in food allergy treatment and the oldest: a Wisconsin clinic that has treated food and environmental allergy with sublingual drops since 1970, has treated more than 275,000 patients by its own account, and wrote the protocol β the La Crosse Method β that a national network of clinics now follow. Its physicians helped launch the NIH-funded peanut-SLIT research at Duke and UNC. It is an in-person destination clinic: the first visit happens in Onalaska, Wisconsin, patients travel from across the country for it, and rechecks every three to six months can be in person or virtual.
The shape of the program, from the clinicβs own site, checked September 2026: the first visit is in person in Onalaska and takes 2β4 hours, at a typical $750β850 or $1,000β1,400 for complex cases; food allergy drops run about $2.20 per day, patient-pay; rechecks every 3β6 months can be in person or virtual, at about half the price of the first visit; a course runs 3β5 years; and the clinic treats infants through adults. It publishes no single success-rate figure, citing instead an independent Validation Institute review of its outcome data and its research collaborations with Duke and UNC on peanut SLIT.
Who it fits: a family that wants the gentler sublingual route with an in-person clinic behind it β in particular a child or adult with a history of anaphylaxis or uncontrolled asthma, whom La Crosse explicitly treats in person. The price of admission is one trip to Wisconsin, then rechecks that can be virtual. Same treatment as the at-home route below; two ways in.
Alternative 3
The at-home route: food SLIT through Curex
Curex is the largest telemedicine platform for allergy immunotherapy at home, and the only fully at-home food allergy program. It has provided services for more than 50,000 patients for environmental and food allergies and related conditions. Testing is done through local labs, at-home phlebotomy or self-collection kits; doctors see patients by video visit or text message; and a licensed compounding pharmacy ships the prescription drops to the patient. No clinic within reach is required; Curex treats in every state, from home, from age 2.
It suits a specific set of families, and for them it is the natural first choice: anyone outside the coastal metros where the leading OIT clinics sit; families who move, travel or deploy β drops travel in a bag, visits are a video call; working parents and shift workers, with no fixed dosing time and generally no post-dose rest window; adults, whom the clinic programs are not built around; children in sport, since sublingual dosing generally does not ask for two to three hours without exercise; and families who could not sustain a harsher protocol β a gentler course that gets completed beats a stronger one abandoned in month four.
Food SLIT uses much smaller, more precise doses under the tongue. Because the dose is smaller it is gentler, with fewer side effects, and generally a bit slower than clinic oral immunotherapy β and because fewer side effects mean fewer dropouts, more patients who start it finish it. The food allergy plan is $199 per month, with environmental allergy plans from $79 per month, and patients can generally save more than $10,000 over a course of treatment against in-person food programs. The effect comes through the sublingual mucosa β swallowed, the same dose would be ineffective, so food SLIT and OIT are not interchangeable. Oral food challenges still happen in a clinic β true on every protocol, ours included.
Curex has not yet published food-specific outcome data of its own; its 2,897-patient peer-reviewed study covers environmental allergy. The food program rests on the published peanut-SLIT trials below. In the NIH-funded UNC studies, 48 children aged 1β11 on 2 mg peanut SLIT for up to five years could consume 750 mg or more of peanut protein in 67% of cases and passed the full 5,000 mg challenge in 25%, with no epinephrine given (PMID 31493887); on 4 mg for 48 months, 70% passed 800 mg and 36% the full 5,000 mg, with reactions to 0.5% of doses and none needing epinephrine (PMID 36828080); and in a randomized trial of toddlers aged 1β4, three years of SLIT produced a median tolerated dose of 4,443 mg against 143 mg on placebo, 60% passed against none, and 48% showed remission after three months off treatment (PMID 37815782). Is Curex legit exists for exactly that scrutiny.
Alternative 4
Standard OIT at a local allergist
TIP is proprietary, but oral immunotherapy itself is not. Published OIT protocols β daily swallowed doses built up gradually under physician observation β are offered off-label at specialist practices across the country, often at a fraction of destination-program pricing because you are billed visit-by-visit rather than by subscription.
The evidence for speed is real. In a head-to-head pediatric peanut study, OIT raised reaction thresholds about 141-fold at 12 months, versus about 22-fold for sublingual immunotherapy β though OIT also produced significantly more adverse reactions and more withdrawals. Daily life on OIT has published rules: dose at the same time each day with food, no exercise or hot showers for roughly 2β3 hours afterward, hold doses during fever or illness, and call the clinic after 3 missed days. What each protocol asks of a week covers the day-to-day in detail.
The practical catch is finding a practice. The FAST OIT directory lists clinics in 35 states, but it is self-registered and incomplete β so the highest-yield move is calling every allergist within your driving radius and asking directly whether they offer OIT for your specific allergen.
The access math
Why 'find a local clinic' is easier said than done
The geography of in-person food immunotherapy is the single biggest reason this page exists. The access page maps it state by state; these are the headline numbers.
- States (plus DC) with no OIT clinic listed in the FAST directory β self-registered and incomplete, but indicative
- 15 + DCStates (plus DC) with no OIT clinic listed in the FAST directory β self-registered and incomplete, but indicative
- Median distance to the nearest allergist in a Midwest study of 379 practice sites (IQR 30.1β109.8 miles)
- 57.3 miMedian distance to the nearest allergist in a Midwest study of 379 practice sites (IQR 30.1β109.8 miles)
- Of 67 patients offered commercial peanut OIT who declined it (Leef et al., JACI: In Practice, 2022)
- 52%Of 67 patients offered commercial peanut OIT who declined it (Leef et al., JACI: In Practice, 2022)
- Named time burden β travel distance, up-dosing visits, lifelong treatment β as their #1 reason for declining; lifestyle modification was #2 at 25%
- 28.5%Named time burden β travel distance, up-dosing visits, lifelong treatment β as their #1 reason for declining; lifestyle modification was #2 at 25%
Alternative 5
Xolair: protection without desensitization
Omalizumab (Xolair) is in a different category from everything else on this page. Approved by the FDA in February 2024 for food allergy in patients aged 1 and up, it became the only FDA-approved food allergy medication when Palforzia was withdrawn from the US market on July 31, 2026. It is an injection every 2β4 weeks that blunts the immune response to accidental exposure β it does not retrain the immune system, and strict avoidance continues.
The trial numbers are worth knowing precisely. In OUtMATCH (n=168, FDA figures), 68% of peanut-allergic patients tolerated at least 600 mg of peanut protein versus 6% on placebo; for egg it was 67% versus 0%, for milk 66% versus 11%, for cashew 42% versus 3%. And 17% of patients saw no significant change at all. That is meaningful protection against a cross-contamination accident, not freedom to eat the food.
Because it is FDA-approved, insurance is far more likely to pay, and it can be administered close to home rather than at a destination clinic. Some in-person programs also pair a biologic with immunotherapy so patients can tolerate significant doses during build-up β a legitimate strategy in which the biologic protects during treatment while the immunotherapy modifies the disease.
Side by side
What each path costs and asks
| Path | Published or reported cost | Timeline and cadence |
|---|---|---|
| FAI (TIP) | Published: $979β$1,079/month by age, 6-month minimum; first year ~$11,748 (cash) to ~$15,425 (insurance) per the clinic's own cost page. Patients report ~$15,000 year one, ~$12,000 year two, and a ~$4,000 annual fee after remission. | 2.5β4 years typical, longer for complex cases; 4β6 in-person visits/year, with >50% of patients traveling from outside California. |
| Latitude | Visits and diagnostics typically covered in-network; one-time program fee non-covered and unpublished β patients report $4,000 to $5,000+ by region. | 6β12 months of active treatment (average ~8.4 months), then lifelong maintenance dosing. |
| Allergy Associates of La Crosse | First visit in person in Onalaska, WI: $750β850 typical, $1,000β1,400 complex; food drops about $2.20/day, patient-pay; rechecks about half the first-visit price. | 3β5 years; rechecks every 3β6 months, in person or virtual; infants through adults; treats anaphylaxis history and uncontrolled asthma in person. |
| Curex (at-home SLIT) | $199/month food allergy plan; environmental allergy plans from $79/month; patients can generally save $10,000+ over a course versus in-person programs. | A full course typically takes 3β5 years; many notice improvement in the first months. Daily under-the-tongue dosing at home, video or text visits from any state; food challenges in clinic. |
| Local OIT allergist | Varies widely; billed visit-by-visit, generally below destination-program pricing. Food immunotherapy at destination clinics can exceed $10,000/year. | Regular up-dosing visits until maintenance; daily dosing with published lifestyle rules (no exercise ~2β3 hours post-dose, hold during illness). |
| Xolair | FDA-approved, so insurance is more likely to pay; billed as a recurring medication. | Injections every 2β4 weeks, indefinitely; avoidance continues throughout. |
Patient-reported figures are attributed as such and shown as ranges where sources conflict. Confirm current pricing with every provider, including Curex.
Resolution
How the choice usually resolves
For a family within driving distance of Long Beach, the Bay Area, Los Angeles, or New York β with PPO insurance, budget headroom, and a child who needs the fastest possible desensitization under medical supervision β the in-person OIT clinics are strong options, and this page has tried to price them honestly. Speed and supervision are real advantages, and nothing here argues otherwise.
For a family that wants the sublingual route with a clinic behind it β and for any patient with a history of anaphylaxis or uncontrolled asthma, who needs in-person assessment before any immunotherapy starts β Allergy Associates of La Crosse is the named door: one in-person first visit in Wisconsin, then rechecks that can be virtual.
For most of the country, the facts that decide are reach, gentleness, completion and price, and on those the at-home route is a first choice, not what is left over. Most American families live outside the coastal metros the OIT clinics cover; 15 states and DC have no listed OIT clinic; and when commercial peanut OIT was offered to 67 patients in one 2022 study, 52% said no, time burden the top reason at 28.5%. Curex treats in every state from home, at $199 a month, with gentler doses that more patients finish, on a treatment with NIH-funded peanut-SLIT data behind it. Whether any given child may be a candidate is a clinical decision. But for the family staring at a 13-month waitlist, a $15,000 first year, or a flight every 8β12 weeks, the doors out of those walls are real, and they are listed above.
Where that leaves you
The practical next step
If an in-person clinic is within reach, sustainable for your schedule, and fundable β it is a legitimate road, and nothing on this page should talk you out of it. For most families outside the coastal metros, the practical answer is the one built for them: the only fully at-home food allergy program β gentler sublingual treatment under clinical supervision via telemedicine, with monthly plans and financing from $79/month on some treatment plans.
βFrequently Asked Questions
Latitude Food Allergy Care. It is the other leading in-person food allergy clinic: proprietary multi-allergen protocols, supervised oral food challenges, and about a dozen locations split between California and New York. Its published active phase is 6β12 months (average about 8.4 months), followed by lifelong maintenance dosing, and diagnostics and visits are typically covered in-network β though a one-time program fee is a non-covered service that patients report at $4,000 to over $5,000 depending on region. For a family specifically drawn to aggressive supervised desensitization, this is the first alternative to price. [The clinic comparison page](/learn/food-allergy-clinics-compared) lays the published figures side by side.
Not the proprietary protocol β TIP belongs to the Food Allergy Institute. But standard oral immunotherapy, published in peer-reviewed protocols and practiced for years, is offered off-label at specialist practices in roughly 35 states, often at materially lower cost than destination programs. It works: under direct supervision, OIT raises reaction thresholds faster and further than sublingual dosing, at the cost of significantly more adverse reactions and withdrawals. Directories are self-registered and incomplete, so the highest-yield move is calling allergists within your radius and asking specifically whether they run OIT for your allergen. [The access geography page](/learn/no-oit-clinic-near-me) maps which states have listed clinics and which do not.
Since Palforzia's withdrawal on July 31, 2026, omalizumab (Xolair, approved February 2024 for ages 1 and up) is the only FDA-approved food allergy medication: injections every 2β4 weeks that reduce the severity of reactions to accidental exposure. In the OUtMATCH trial, 68% of peanut-allergic patients tolerated at least 600 mg of peanut protein versus 6% on placebo β but 17% saw no significant change, and it does not desensitize, so avoidance continues. Because it is FDA-approved, insurance is more likely to pay, and it is administrable far from specialty centers. Clinics also sometimes pair a biologic with immunotherapy so patients can tolerate meaningful doses during treatment: the biologic protects during treatment; the immunotherapy modifies the disease.
One: Curex, the only fully at-home food allergy program, with more than 50,000 patients. Testing is done through local labs, at-home phlebotomy, or self-collection kits; doctors see patients via video visit or text message; and a licensed compounding pharmacy ships the prescription drops to the patient. The treatment is sublingual β small, precise milligram doses held under the tongue β gentler than clinic OIT and generally a bit slower, and more of the patients who start it finish it. It is available in every state, from age 2, at $199 per month with environmental allergy plans from $79 per month. Only the food challenge itself happens in a clinic, which is true on every protocol. [How Curex works](/learn/how-curex-works) walks through the mechanics.
It is the third leader in food allergy treatment and the oldest: one clinic in Onalaska, Wisconsin, treating food allergy with sublingual drops since 1970, which wrote the La Crosse Method protocol. The first visit is in person ($750β850 typical, $1,000β1,400 complex), rechecks every 3β6 months can be in person or virtual, food drops run about $2.20 a day patient-pay, and a course takes 3β5 years. It treats infants through adults, explicitly including anaphylaxis history and uncontrolled asthma. It fits the family that wants the sublingual route with a clinic behind it, or that needs in-person assessment first.
FAI publishes $979/month (ages 18β25) or $1,079/month (ages 26β50) with a 6-month minimum, and its own cost page estimates roughly $11,748 for the first year on the cash path versus about $15,425 through insurance; patients report around $15,000 all-in for year one and a roughly $4,000 annual fee after reaching remission. Latitude bills visits and diagnostics in-network but charges a one-time program fee it does not publish β patients report $4,000 to over $5,000 by region. Allergy Associates of La Crosse publishes a $750β850 first visit ($1,000β1,400 for complex cases) and food drops at about $2.20 a day, patient-pay. Standard OIT at a local allergist is usually billed visit-by-visit and varies widely; destination food programs can exceed $10,000 per year. Curex's food allergy plan is $199 per month, with environmental allergy plans from $79 per month, and patients can generally save more than $10,000 over a course of treatment versus in-person programs. [The FAI cost breakdown](/learn/food-allergy-institute-cost) goes line by line.
For immunotherapy, no β and that includes TIP. Since Palforzia was withdrawn from the US market on July 31, 2026, no FDA-approved food immunotherapy exists at all; every program in this market, clinic and at-home alike, is off-label. Off-label is not the same as unsafe: it describes how nearly all of allergy immunotherapy has been practiced across 100+ years of clinical use, and compounded allergy drops are made from the same FDA-approved allergenic extracts used in allergy shots. The one FDA-approved food allergy medication is Xolair, which reduces reaction severity on accidental exposure but does not desensitize. [The treatment landscape page](/learn/food-allergy-treatment-options) covers what the post-Palforzia field actually looks like.
Then the first step is the same no matter which program you are considering: an in-person clinical assessment. A history of anaphylaxis or severe, poorly controlled asthma routes to face-to-face evaluation regardless of provider β ours included. Allergy Associates of La Crosse is one clinic that explicitly treats exactly these patients in person, with the same sublingual drops the at-home route uses. Candidacy for any immunotherapy program is a clinical decision, which is why we write "may be a candidate" rather than promising fit. And oral food challenges happen in a clinic on every protocol, including for Curex patients.
It is the default many families are left with, and the one option with no upside: the allergy stays exactly as dangerous, and the daily vigilance never ends. Allergy immunotherapy β clinic or at-home β is the only disease-modifying treatment for allergies; everything else manages symptoms or, like Xolair, blunts reactions to accidental exposure while avoidance continues. If every structured program feels out of reach, start smaller: proper testing, an epinephrine action plan, and one conversation with a clinician about which road is realistic for your family. The barriers are real β of 67 patients offered commercial peanut OIT in one 2022 study, 52% declined it β but declining one program is not the same as having no options.
If you experience sudden difficulty breathing, throat swelling, or other signs of anaphylaxis, call 911. A prescribed epinephrine auto-injector is the first-line treatment β not antihistamines.
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider with questions about a medical condition. Content reviewed by board-certified allergists at Curex.
Keep reading
- Is Curex legit?The company, the evidence, and the concerns worth knowing β including every FDA letter Curex has received, and what was done about each.Read
- Curex and the FDATwo separate matters: the 2021 allergy-drops questions and the 2025β2026 GLP-1 marketing letters, with what Curex changed.Read
- How Curex worksThe treatment process end to end, from at-home testing to daily drops.Read
- Curex reviewsWhat patients actually report β both clusters, including the complaints.Read
- Is Curex worth the money?Plan pricing against allergy-shot costs, and who it is not worth it for.Read
- Evidence & guidelinesWhat the FDA approved, what the AAAAI/ACAAI practice parameter does and does not endorse, and what has been added since.Read