Treatment when you are not seven years old
Food immunotherapy research and programs centre on children. Adults are treatable — with more caveats, fewer programs, and a different risk conversation.
Adults have real options, with honest caveats. Latitude treats adults case-by-case — a public account describes a 36-year-old accepted for peanut OIT after meeting a component-IgE threshold, reaching maintenance in under a year. Food Allergy Institute publishes an age range up to 50. Standard OIT practices vary widely on adults. Xolair is approved from age 1 with no upper bound. At-home sublingual treatment takes adults and fits working schedules — no rest windows around workouts, no twice-monthly clinic slots. The caveats: adult desensitisation is less studied than paediatric, published response rates skew lower, and adult OIT carries lifestyle rules (exercise, alcohol) that matter more in adult lives. Curex competes in this market.
Medically reviewed by Dr. Chet Tharpe, M.D. · Last reviewed September 2026
The adult map
Who treats adults, and on what terms
| Route | Adult access | The adult-specific catch |
|---|---|---|
| Latitude | Case-by-case; public account of a 36-year-old accepted above an IgE threshold | Individualised candidacy, not a published policy |
| Food Allergy Institute | Published range reaches age 50 | Multi-year subscription and travel cadence |
| Standard OIT allergists | Varies widely by practice | Daily OIT rules land harder on adult schedules |
| Xolair | Approved age 1+, no upper bound | Reduces accidental-exposure severity; does not desensitize |
| At-home SLIT (Curex) | Adults accepted; telemedicine-native | Gentler and generally somewhat slower desensitisation |
Competitor figures are what each provider published on its own site or what patients reported publicly, dated where checked. Prices and policies change — confirm current figures with each provider, including us, before enrolling.
Honest expectations
The adult evidence caveat, stated plainly
Food immunotherapy’s evidence base skews heavily paediatric. Adult desensitisation is achievable — documented across modalities — but published response rates run lower and dropout higher than in children, and no program can promise adult results from paediatric data. Calibrate with your clinician; “may be a candidate” is the honest phrase, for their programs and ours alike.
Curex competes in this market — we run the only fully at-home food allergy program — so read this page as a competitor’s honest summary of the public record and verify against the sources.
❓Frequently Asked Questions
Case-by-case, by the public record: their materials centre on children, but a 36-year-old peanut-allergic adult publicly described being accepted after meeting a component-IgE threshold (2.0 or greater in that account) and reaching maintenance within a year. Call, ask about your allergen and labs, and expect an individualised answer rather than a policy.
The published literature skews paediatric, and adult studies generally show desensitisation is achievable but with lower response rates and more dropouts than in children. That is a reason for calibrated expectations and clinician-led candidacy decisions — not a reason adults should assume the answer is no. Treating earlier in life works better; treating later still works.
The daily rules collide with adult routines: roughly two-hour rest windows around exercise and hot showers after each dose, alcohol cautions, dose timing with food, illness holds — every day, for the duration. A 36-year-old with a gym habit and work travel feels these more than a 7-year-old does. Sublingual dosing carries far lighter rules, which is a real part of why adults choose it.
Within reach of a clinic, wanting maximum supervised speed, labs supporting candidacy: a clinic OIT program is a strong option. Far from clinics, or with a schedule OIT rules would break: at-home sublingual treatment, gentler and generally somewhat slower. Wanting protection against accidental exposure without desensitisation: Xolair locally. History of anaphylaxis or unstable asthma: in-person assessment before anything, anywhere.
If you experience sudden difficulty breathing, throat swelling, or other signs of anaphylaxis, call 911. A prescribed epinephrine auto-injector is the first-line treatment — not antihistamines.
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider with questions about a medical condition. Content reviewed by board-certified allergists at Curex.
Keep reading
- Is Curex legit?The company, the evidence, and the concerns worth knowing — including full context on the 2025 FDA warning letter.Read
- How Curex worksThe treatment process end to end, from at-home testing to daily drops.Read
- Curex reviewsWhat patients actually report — both clusters, including the complaints.Read
- Is Curex worth the money?Plan pricing against allergy-shot costs, and who it is not worth it for.Read
- Evidence & guidelinesWhat the FDA approved, what the AAAAI/ACAAI practice parameter does and does not endorse, and what has been added since.Read
- Providers comparedCurex, Wyndly and Nectar on published prices, guarantees and evidence — including where a competitor is ahead.Read